Browse Client Types

Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors

Trial Number 0

Trial Purpose:

To test two solvents in cleaning oil and grease from stainless steel as an alternative to TCE using unheated immersion.

Date Run:

05/23/2023

Experiment Procedure:

Two solvents were identified previously using the Hspip software; SB-33 (D-limonene 85% +Dimethyl glutarate 15%) and SB-31 (Benzyl alcohol 63% + Ethyl lactate 37%).  Twelve stainless steel coupons were chosen and intial weights of each were recorded.  Half of the coupons were soiled with Hocut 795 and half were soiled with RI-780.  The soils were applied to the bottom third of each coupon using a swab.  The coupons were then cleaned by their respective solvent using a method of unheated immersion.  The coupons were immersed for 15 minutes with a stir bar set to 200 rpm.  The coupons were then removed and left to dry overnight.  The next morning clean weights were recorded.  

Trial Results:

Cleaner Soil Substrate Initial wt Dirty wt Clean wt. Initial wt of cont. Final wt of cont. %Cont Removed % AVG % Overall
SB-33 Hocut 795 Stainless Steel 59.0069 59.0317 59.0122 0.0248 0.0053 78.63 73.09 79.61
Stainless Steel 60.3367 60.3888 60.3418 0.0521 0.0051 90.21
Stainless Steel 63.8959 63.9072 63.9015 0.0113 0.0056 50.44
RI 780 Stainless Steel 63.9891 64.0096 63.993 0.0205 0.0039 80.98 86.12
Stainless Steel 63.8677 63.8856 63.8679 0.0179 0.0002 98.88
Stainless Steel 59.9843 60.0029 59.9883 0.0186 0.0040 78.49
SB-31 Hocut 795 Stainless Steel 58.9639 59.0367 59.0014 0.0728 0.0375 48.49 38.64 68.95
Stainless Steel 60.088 60.1232 60.1211 0.0352 0.0331 5.97
Stainless Steel 59.1426 59.2225 59.1734 0.0799 0.0308 61.45
RI 780 Stainless Steel 60.2134 60.242 60.2179 0.0286 0.0045 84.27 99.27
Stainless Steel 60.1841 60.214 60.1874 0.0299 0.0033 88.96
Stainless Steel 49.5706 49.5942 49.5648 0.0236 -0.0058 124.58

SB-33 was able to completely air dry overnight.  SB-31 did not air dry overnight and left pools of solvent on the coupons.  The final weights of these coupons include the weight of the left over solvent.  This means that SB-31 would most likely be effective with a drying step.

Success Rating:

Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined.

Conclusion:

SB-33 was successful in removing both soils from the coupons using unheated immersion.  SB-31 was successful in removing RI 780 from the coupons using unheated immersion.  It was not successful in removing Hocut 795 from the coupons using unheated immersion.

Save Report as a PDF