Project Number 1
Summary: Several Aqueous cleaners were recommended for the removal of the preventive material and a terpene, T Square HTF 60, was suggested for the paint removal.
Test Objective: Remove rust preventive coatings and prepare parts for assembly
Purpose of Cleaning: prepare parts for assembly
Product Use: Parts for large gear boxes, i.e. shafts, gears.
Cleaning Chemicals: Mineral Spirits
|
|
Trial Number
|
Date Run
|
Purpose
|
Success Rating
|
| 1 |
07/09/97 |
Four terpene based cleaners were tested |
Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined. |
| 4 |
07/29/97 |
Petroleum based rust preventative trial. |
Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined. |
| 6 |
07/31/97 |
Dirt, Grease, Oil and Metal Fines retest |
Results suggest a scale-up feasible match for cleaning chemistry and equipment. Pilot plant study with actual parts recommended. |
| 2 |
07/09/97 |
Practical application of two terpene cleaners. |
A follow up test, usually based on company input. |
| 3 |
07/25/97 |
Non-hardening rust preventive cleaning trial. |
A follow up test, usually based on company input. |
| 5 |
07/30/97 |
Dirt, Grease, Oil, and metal fines cleaning. |
Test inconclusive. |
| 0 |
07/08/97 |
To determine a replacement for ink removal |
Test showed little or no promise. |
Project Number 2
Summary: On-going project
Test Objective: To replace hazardous cleaning solvent with a safer product.
Problems with Current Method: Hazardous component in cleaning solvent
Purpose of Cleaning: Preparing parts for rework and repair
Cleaning Chemicals: Kleer Flo Degreasol Formula 99 R
|
|
Trial Number
|
Date Run
|
Purpose
|
Success Rating
|
| 0 |
08/04/08 |
To evaluate aqueous based alternatives for removing rust preventative coating using immersion cleaning. |
Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined. |
| 1 |
08/04/08 |
To reevaluate selected products on the first supplied rust preventative using higher concentrations |
Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined. |
| 2 |
08/04/08 |
To evaluate selected products on second supplied rust preventative using immersion cleaning at room temperature. |
Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined. |
| 3 |
08/05/08 |
To evaluate non-aqueous alternative cleaning products on the first supplied rust preventative |
Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined. |
| 4 |
08/05/08 |
To evaluate past products using ultrasonic cleaning on first supplied rust preventative |
Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined. |
| 5 |
09/23/08 |
To reevaluate previously tested products using ultrasonics and heat. |
Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined. |
| 6 |
09/23/08 |
To evaluate successful products on second supplied contaminant using ultrasonics and heat. |
Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined. |
| 7 |
09/23/08 |
To evaluate successful products on third supplied contaminant using heated ultrasonic cleaning. |
Results suggest a scale-up feasible match for cleaning chemistry and equipment. Pilot plant study with actual parts recommended. |
| 8 |
09/24/08 |
To evaluate effective products on supplied contaminants using heated immersion cleaning. |
A follow up test, usually based on company input. |
| 9 |
09/23/08 |
To evaluate top two products on supplied contaminant using heated immersion cleaning. |
Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined. |
| 10 |
09/24/08 |
To evaluate top two products on thirds supplied contaminant using heated immersion cleaning. |
Results suggest a scale-up feasible match for cleaning chemistry and equipment. Pilot plant study with actual parts recommended. |
| 11 |
10/16/08 |
To evaluate top cleaning products without rinsing. |
A follow up test, usually based on company input. |
| 12 |
02/03/09 |
To evaluate top cleaning products without rinsing. |
Results suggest a scale-up feasible match for cleaning chemistry and equipment. Pilot plant study with actual parts recommended. |
| 13 |
05/22/09 |
To evaluate cleaners on supplied dirty parts following current cleaning process |
A follow up test, usually based on company input. |