CleanerSolutions Database
Toxics Use Reduction Institute · Surface Solutions Laboratory
 
Toxics Use Reduction Institute




Surface Solutions Laboratory

Trial Report



Trial Number 1

(Client Number 318, Project Number 1)

Trial Purpose: To evaluate performance of supplied automatic dishwashing formula for three soil types.

Date Run: 04/24/09

Experiment Procedure:
A supplied product and rinse aid and a traditional automatic dishwashing formulation were tested to determine cleaning efficiencies for three soils from three substrates. The first two soils were taken from ASTM D3556. The third, Hucker's soil, was the all purpose soil the lab uses for janitorial testing.

Standard Food Soil Preparation: A mixture of 80 weight % of margarine and 20 weight % of powdered milk was prepared. The margarine was warmed until fluid and the powdered milk was mixed thoroughly.

Use of this optional soil makes the test more realistic by adding another difficult-to-remove component.
Optional Food Soil Preparation: This mixture consists of 70 % margarine, 15 % powdered milk, and 15 % cooked cereal. The cooked cereal was separately prepared as follows: Add 45 g of cereal to 228 g of water, heat to boiling, and boil for 5 min. Dissolve 100 g of powdered milk in 500 g of water and stir this solution into the cooked cereal. Continue stirring as portions are removed to be combined with margarine and powdered milk that have been blended as in the previous soil preparation. This mixture was made up as required.

Hucker's Soil Formulation: Jif Creamy Peanut Butter 9.2%, Salted Butter 9.2%, Arrowhead Mills stone ground wheat flour 9.2%, Egg Yolk 9.2%, Evaporated milk 13.8%, Distilled water 45.8%, Printer's ink with boiled linseed oil 0.9%, Shaws saline solution 2.7%

Preweighed ceramic (3), glass (3) and stainless steel (3) coupons (representing plates, glasses and silverware) were coated with each of the three soils and allowed to dry overnight. A second weight was recorded to determine the amount of soil added. All nine coupons were loaded into a VWR International Under-counter Glassware Washer (model 82020-922) and run on the light cycle (120 F wash, 140 F rinse). Total cleaning time lasted 2 hours. At the end of the cleaning, coupons were removed and weighed a final time to determine the amount of soil remaining. Percent efficiencies were calculated for each coupon cleaned. Observations were made for spotting or filming.

Trial Results
When the ceramic coupons were weighed after cleaning, the final weights were greater than the initial weights. The weight changes may have bee due to
excess moisture being soaked into the uncoated side of the coupons, increasing the final weights. Visually, all the ceramic coupons for both cleaners
were as clean as the glass and stainless steel coupons. Due to the weight change discrepancy, the gravimetric analysis of the ceramic coupons were not
included in the overall efficiency calculations.
The first table below lists the amount of soil added, the amount remaining and the efficiency for each coupon cleaned. The second table summarizes the
cleaning performance of both product for each of three soils.

Cleaner        Initial wt  Final wt     % Removed
Alpha Chemical Service                        
Food soil #1   0.1273        0.0017        98.66
Glass          0.2438        0.0011        99.55
               0.2409        0.0001        99.96
Alpha Chemical Service                        
Food soil #1   0.2247        0.0003        99.87
Stainless      0.2914       -0.0001       100.03
               0.3269        0.0002        99.94
Alpha Chemical Service                        
Food soil #2   1.5550        0.0010        99.94
Glass          0.8081        0.0001        99.99
               0.6418        0.0001        99.98
Alpha Chemical Service                        
Food soil #2   1.0443       -0.0002       100.02
Stainless      1.0875        0.0006        99.94
               0.5575        0.0003        99.95
Alpha Chemical Service                        
Hucker soil    0.1015        0.0000       100.00
Glass          0.0745       -0.0003       100.40
               0.1208        0.0004        99.67
Alpha Chemical Service                        
Hucker soil    0.0747        0.0004        99.46
Stainless      0.1112       -0.0004       100.36
               0.0770        0.0014        98.18
Cascade                        
Food soil #1   0.1424       -0.0004       100.28
Glass          0.1317       -0.0008       100.61
               0.3055       -0.0002       100.07
Cascade                        
Food soil #1   0.2059        0.0001        99.95
Stainless      0.1787       -0.0001       100.06
               0.1927        0.0000       100.00
Cascade                        
Food soil #2   2.0406       -0.0002       100.01
Glass          1.8063       -0.0002       100.01
               1.2554        0.0000       100.00
Cascade                        
Food soil #2   1.5470        0.0001        99.99
Stainless      0.5448       -0.0001       100.02
               0.9941        0.0001        99.99
Cascade                        
Hucker soil    0.1310       -0.0001       100.08
Glass          0.2138       -0.0004       100.19
               0.1341       -0.0005       100.37
Cascade                        
Hucker soil    0.0900       -0.0004       100.44
Stainless      0.1051        0.0004        99.62
               0.0887        0.0001        99.89


                           Food Soil 1   Food Soil 2  Hucker's Soil Overall Average
Alpha Chemical Service        99.67        99.97        99.68        99.77
Cascade                      100.16       100.00       100.10       100.09

Ceramic observations                                
Alpha Chemical Service        Pass         Pass         Pass  
Cascade                       Pass         Pass         Pass


Success Rating
A follow up test, usually based on company input.

Conclusion
The supplied product worked as well as the traditional cleaning product removing close to 100% of each of the three soils.