Browse Client Types

Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors

Trial Number 1

Trial Purpose:

To test the efficiency of SAAFH Device Cleaner in the removal of carpet soil from Aluminum, Glass and Plastic.

Date Run:

02/10/2021

Experiment Procedure:

Aluminum, glass, and plastic coupons were gathered and designated for the two cleaners being tested. Initial weights of the coupons were measured. The carpet soil solution was made using 5 grams of carpet soil mix and 45 grams of mineral oil. 1 gram of this mixture was spread onto each coupon using a swab. Coupons were left to air dry for 1 hour. After the 1 hour, coupons were weighed again to record their contaminated weights. Coupons were then loaded into the gravimetric manual wiping machine 3 at a time. 3 of the same substrates were loaded with the first cleaner applied to the cloth wipe in an amount of 2 sprays. This was repeated for the next 2 substrates. This process was then repeated with the second comparison cleaner. Once all coupons had been cleaned, final weights were taken and recorded for each coupon. 

Cleaners Used:

  1. Sustainable Tech Device Cleaner
  2. >99% Isopropyl Alcohol

Substrates Used:

  1. Aluminum
  2. Glass
  3. Plastic

Trial Results:

Overall, both cleaners were effective for the removal of carpet soil from the substrates. Sustainable Tech performed a little better and averaged 91% for the removal on Aluminum, 94% on Glass and 92% on Plastic. Isopropyl Alcohol averaged 89% for Aluminum, 91% for Glass and 92% for Plastic. Coupons were visually clean with minimal additional cleaning necessary. 

Cleaner Substrate Initial wt of cont. Final wt of cont. %Cont Removed % AVG
Sustainable Tech (SAAFH) Device Cleaner Aluminum 0.6593 0.0721 89.06 90.66
0.7183 0.069 90.39
0.7102 0.0531 92.52
Glass 0.7070 0.0421 94.05 94.27
0.7774 0.0491 93.68
0.7740 0.038 95.09
Plastic 0.6512 0.0614 90.57 91.51
0.7320 0.0541 92.61
0.8427 0.0729 91.35
Ultracruz Animal Care Isopropyl Alcohol Aluminum  0.7606 0.0771 89.86 88.65
0.7043 0.0794 88.73
0.7165 0.0906 87.36
Glass 0.6873 0.0871 87.33 91.35
0.8102 0.0558 93.11
0.6316 0.0404 93.60
Plastic 0.9228 0.0805 91.28 91.74
1.0182 0.0794 92.20
0.8535 0.0705 91.74

Success Rating:

Preliminary compatibility tests on substrate coupons encouraging for at least one cleaning chemistry. More in-depth laboratory testing necessary.

Conclusion:

SAAFH Device Cleaner appeared to be more efficient in cleaning contamination off of the substrates than the isopropyl alcohol that it was being compared to in the experiment. SAAFH had a slightly higher overall percentage of cleaning and had higher average percentages on aluminum and glass coupons. Isopropyl alcohol had a slightly higher average percentage on plastic, but not by much. The two products had very similar values with regard to cleaning efficiency, but overall SAAFH cleaned more efficiently than isopropyl alcohol.  

Save Report as a PDF