Browse Client Types

Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors

Trial Number 1

Trial Purpose:

To evaluate the supplied products for bathroom cleaning using manual cleaning

Date Run:

08/15/2012

Experiment Procedure:

One gram of Tartar was added into 20 fl oz of water (PH 6.5) in supplied spray bottle of Trio then was electronically charged for 3min. after activating, the PH of activated water was changed into 11. The other supplied cleaning products, Clorox Green Work Bathroom Cleaner and Comet Bathroom, were used at the recommended dilution. Pre-weighed chrome, ceramic and polycarbonate coupons were coated with SSL Soil 1 (Bathroom soap scum: All-in-one shampoo and conditioner 28.6%, Dry skin lotion 21.4%, Liquid hand soap 21.4%, Liquid body wash 14.3%, Deodorant bar soap 7.2% and water 7.1%.) using a handheld swab and allowed to dry for 24 hours at room temperature. The contaminated coupons were weighed again to determine the amount of soil added.

Three coupons were placed into a Gardner Straight Line Washability unit. A Wypall X60 reinforced wipe was attached to the cleaning sled and soaked with 5-7 sprays of cleaning solutions. Each coupon was sprayed 2-3 times with the same cleaning solution. The solution was allowed to penetrate for 30 seconds followed by cleaning in the SLW unit for 20 cycles (~33 seconds). Final weights were measured and efficiencies were calculated and recorded.

Chemistries Evaluated: Trio (1g of Tartar, PH 11), Water (PH 6.5), Clorox Green work Bathroom Cleaner, Comet Bathroom Cleaner

Trial Results:

The Trio removed the TURI bathroom soil over than 95% on polycarbonate and chrome, but Trio only removed 83% of bathroom soil on ceramic coupon. The other three cleaners also removed the soil over than 85% on all surfaces except water with ceramic. The detail information is below.

Cleaner Initial wt Final wt % Removed
Trio_ploycarb      
  0.1662 0.0086 94.83
  0.1062 0.0010 99.06
  0.0843 0.0075 91.10
Trio_ceramic      
  0.1041 0.0225 78.39
  0.4892 0.0513 89.51
  0.1339 0.0258 80.73
Trio_chrome      
  0.0727 0.0035 95.19
  0.1158 0.0058 94.99
  0.1156 0.0043 96.28
Water_ploycarb      
  0.1196 0.0063 94.73
  0.1336 0.0019 98.58
  0.1008 0.0305 69.74
Water_ceramic      
  0.1069 0.0058 94.57
  0.0848 0.0117 86.20
  0.1295 0.0405 68.73
Water_chrome      
  0.0687 0.0053 92.29
  0.0729 0.0065 91.08
  0.0737 0.0043 94.17
Clorox Greenwork Bathroom Cleaner_ploycarb      
  0.1284 0.0123 90.42
  0.1637 0.0048 97.07
  0.1555 0.0077 95.05
Clorox Greenwork Bathroom Cleaner_ceramic      
  0.2309 0.0528 77.13
  0.1354 0.0146 89.22
  0.0891 0.0013 98.54
Clorox Greenwork Bathroom Cleaner_chrome      
  0.0734 0.0073 90.05
  0.0924 0.0037 96.00
  0.1352 0.0067 95.04
Comet Bathroom Cleaner_ploycarb      
  0.0612 0.0071 88.40
  0.1036 0.0061 94.11
  0.1160 0.0097 91.64
Comet Bathroom Cleaner_ceramic      
  0.1779 0.0393 77.91
  0.1396 0.0010 99.28
  0.1505 0.0111 92.62
Comet Bathroom Cleaner_chrome      
  0.1252 0.0061 95.13
  0.1111 0.0063 94.33
  0.1053 0.0061 94.21

Success Rating:

Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined.

Conclusion:

The Trio product had an overall average efficiency over 85% and performed similar as the green and conventional cleaning product.

Save Report as a PDF