Browse Client Types

Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors

Trial Number 0

Trial Purpose:

Analysis results from the parts

Date Run:

06/20/1996

Trial Results:

Here is the cleanliness analysis results from the parts that you brought down to the lab yesterday. Two tests were done to test the cleaning efficiency of the 10% Daraclean 211 solution as compared to the current vapor degreasing process. The first test was the cotton swap wipe test which you saw in the lab. This showed that there was no distinguishable difference between the tubes cleaned with the Daraclean 212 and the Vapor Degreaser.

The second test I performed was using an OSEE (Optically Stimulated Electron Emission) unit. The OSEE exposes the metal part to UV light and measures the resulting electron emission in the form of a current. Contamination of the metal part will result in a resistance to electron emission and will produce a lower current. OSEE data was collected for both the interior and the exterior of the tubes with the results given below. It appears that the Daraclean 212 is just as effective as your current vapor degreasing operation.

OSEE RESULTS

Cleaned with 10% Daraclean 212 Cleaned in Vapor Degreaser Dirty as received  
interior exterior interior exterior interior exterior  
58 97 49 96 37 54  
59 99 48 91 42 53  
66 85 56 117 38 47  
69 113 40 98 43 48  
80 115 58 72 41 65  
57 84 38 88 51 47  
81 137 48 108 58 45  
63 97 82 115 46 51  
67 127 83 103 43 48  
54 105 66 90 40 52  
76 122 53 127 43 55  
55 118 51 132 57 50  
65.42 108.25 56 103.08 44.92 51.25 Average
9.51 16.54 14.46 17.46 6.91 5.33 Std Dev

Success Rating:

A cleanliness study, addressing only various analytical techniques.

Save Report as a PDF