Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors
Trial Purpose:
6th contaminant cleaning
Date Run:
04/11/2002Experiment Procedure:
Thirteen preweighed coupons were coated with Solutia Gelva 2895 (50862-46-9; 141-78-6; 142-82-5; 67-63-0; 64-17-5; 108-05-4) with a hand held swab. Coupons were reweighed. Five coupons were clipped to wire racks and immersed into the Flow-Matic machine and cleaned for 1 minutes using ultrasonics at 92 F, removed and rinsed in a tap water spray and re-immersed into the ultrasonics for an additional 1 minute followed by a second 5 second rinse. The coupons were then dried using an air knife for 15 seconds. A second set of five coupons followed the same cleaning cycle except they were hung on a wire stand and immersed into a Crest 40 kHz ultrasonic tank. The final three coupons were cleaned in water using stir-bar agitation, rinsed with the spray and dried with air knives.
Trial Results:
Comparison of the two processes revealed that both system were ineffective at removing the resin from the stainless steel coupons.
Table 1. Cleaning Efficiencies
Process | Flow-Matic | Traditional |
13.35 | 10.72 | |
11.87 | 14.07 | |
13.03 | 10.22 | |
10.87 | 14.31 | |
13.80 | 15.48 | |
Average | 12.59 | 12.96 |
Std Dev | 1.20 | 2.34 |
Water in the immersion cleaning removed the same amount of resin as the ultrasonic systems.
Gelva
13.66
10.61
13.57
12.61 Average
1.737 Std Dev
Success Rating:
A follow up test, usually based on company input.Conclusion:
Neither system was effective in cleaning the resin.