Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors
Trial Purpose:
Identify cleaners to remove flux and Hummiseal
Date Run:
01/02/1996Experiment Procedure:
Twelve various circuit boards obtained from a receiver were cut down to a smaller size (approximately 3"x 3") and precleaned. Each part was weighed after precleaning and then contaminated with Humiseal 1B31 and Ersin 5381 RMA Flux. Both contaminants were allowed to set on the parts for six days in a convection oven set at 110 F. The parts were then weighed before cleaning.
Six different chemistries were tested for removal of both the flux and the Humiseal. All chemistries were used at their maximum recommended concentration, and at recommended temperatures.
SUBSTRATE MATERIAL: Circuit Boards
CONTAMINANTS: Humiseal 1B31& Ersin 5381 RMA Flux
CONTAMINATING PROCESS USED: Flux and coating applied on with a brush and allowed to set for 6 days.
A cleaning time of 15 minutes was used for each cleaner. Rinsing was performed in a tap water rinse tank of 130 F for one minute. The parts were run under air knives for 1 minute and then placed in a convection oven at 140 F for 20 minutes to dry. After drying, the parts were weighed again to get a percent removal of contaminants and inspected under a black light to see how much residual contaminant was present.
Trial Results:
Gravimetric results were all screwed up so the results will not be judged on them.
Two chemistries seemed to show potential. Tech Spray Defluxer and WR Grace Daraclean 282. The Daraclean 282 removed all flux. The humiseal was not removed, but started to peel off after 15 minutes. After drying the humiseal was quite tacky on both of the circuit boards. The Tech Spray has a dissolving action on the Humiseal which I feel will end up in better cleaning than a lifting action. A slight bit of flux remained on the Tech Spray boards.
The Chemtronics, Valtron, Armakleen 2001 and Innovative Organics cleaners were all ineffective in removing both contaminants and will not be tested further.
GRAVIMETRIC RESULTS
Cleaning Solution: Tech Spray Inc. Aqueous Defluxer
sample # | clean mass (g) | mass with contamination (g) | mass after cleaning (g) | contaminant removed (g) | Percent Removal |
1 | 34.0402 | 34.4275 | 34.4950 | ‑0.0675 | ‑17.43% |
2 | 22.5303 | 22.9010 | 22.8220 | 0.079 | 21.31% |
Average | 1.94% |
Cleaning Solution: Chemtronics Super Bio-Wash
sample # | clean mass (g) | mass with contamination (g) | mass after cleaning (g) | contaminant removed (g) | Percent Removal |
3 | 18.5089 | 18.9178 | 18.9144 | 0.0034 | 0.83% |
4 | 16.7197 | 17.1085 | 17.1187 | ‑0.0102 | ‑2.62% |
Average | ‑0.90% |
Cleaning Solution: Valtech Corp. Valtron SP2201
sample # | clean mass (g) | mass with contamination (g) | mass after cleaning (g) | contaminant removed (g) | Percent Removal |
5 | 16.1899 | 16.4580 | 16.4592 | ‑0.0012 | ‑0.45% |
6 | 25.0008 | 25.2955 | 25.2718 | 0.0237 | 8.04% |
Average | 3.80% |
Cleaning Solution: Innovative Organics SC11
sample # | clean mass (g) | mass with contamination (g) | mass after cleaning (g) | contaminant removed (g) | Percent Removal |
7 | 24.8917 | 25.2485 | 25.1977 | 0.0508 | 14.24% |
8 | 21.9369 | 22.0782 | 22.0415 | 0.0367 | 25.97% |
Average | 20.11% |
Cleaning Solution: Church & Dwight Armakleene E-2001
sample # | clean mass (g) | mass with contamination (g) | mass after cleaning (g) | contaminant removed (g) | Percent Removal |
9 | 19.7927 | 20.1263 | 20.1480 | 0.0217 | 6.50% |
10 | 14.9243 | 15.2423 | 15.2331 | ‑0.0092 | ‑2.89% |
Average | 1.81% |
Cleaning Solution: WR Grace Daraclean 211
sample # | clean mass (g) | mass with contamination (g) | mass after cleaning (g) | contaminant removed (g) | Percent Removal |
11 | 23.1156 | 23.3780 | 23.3075 | 0.0705 | 26.87% |
12 | 14.9087 | 15.0416 | 15.0259 | 0.0157 | 11.81% |
Average | 19.34% |
Success Rating:
Test incomplete or inconclusive.Conclusion:
Cleaning time will have to be increased. Temperature should be kept as high as possible without damaging parts (maximum temp of 150-160 F). If longer cleaning times are not effective, new chemistries will have to be scoped out. Possible chemicals to be ordered:
Finger Lakes Company-Semi-Aqueous Electrical Cleaner
ADF Systems Ltd-Nutraclean 9 aqueous cleaner
Chem-Tech International-CT-24 Flux Remover
Envirosense Inc.-Envirogold Aqueous Cleaner
Rochester Midland Corp.-Alpha Excel
Terpene Tech.-Tarksol Semi Aqueous Terpene
Today & Beyond- Beyond 2003
London Chemical Co.-Longoterge