Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors
Trial Purpose:
To evaluate the supplied products for bathroom cleaning using manual cleaning
Date Run:
03/16/2010Experiment Procedure:
The supplied cleaning product were used at the recommended concentration (2%, 2% and 1.5%). Preweighed chrome, ceramic and fiberglass, coupons were coated with SSL Soil 1 (Bathroom soap scum: All-in-one shampoo and conditioner 28.6%, Dry skin lotion 21.4%, Liquid hand soap 21.4%, Liquid body wash 14.3%, Deodorant bar soap 7.2% and water 7.1%.) using a handheld swab and allowed to dry for 24 hours at room temperature. The contaminated coupons were weighed again to determine the amount of soil added.
Three coupons were placed into a Gardner Straight Line Washability unit. A Wypall X60 reinforced wipe was attached to the cleaning sled and soaked with 5-7 sprays of cleaning solutions. Each coupon was sprayed 7-10 times with the same cleaning solution. The solution was allowed to penetrate for 30 seconds followed by cleaning in the SLW unit for 20 cycles (~33 seconds). At the end of the cleaning, coupons were wiped once with a dry paper towel. Final weights were recorded, and efficiencies were calculated and recorded.
Trial Results:
The two supplied products both removed over 85% of the bathroom soap scum soil from the surfaces using manual cleaning. The conventional product removed 75%. The table lists the amount of soil added, the amount remaining and the efficiency for each coupon cleaned.
Cleaner | Initial wt | Final wt | % Removed |
PC 108(1:48)_Ceramic | |||
0.3057 | 0.0155 | 94.93 | |
0.1234 | 0.0079 | 93.6 | |
0.026 | 0.0025 | 90.38 | |
PC 108(1:48)_Chrome | |||
0.0115 | 0.0019 | 83.48 | |
0.0273 | 0.0024 | 91.21 | |
0.0117 | 0.0038 | 67.52 | |
PC 108(1:48)_Fiberglass | |||
0.0216 | 0.002 | 90.74 | |
0.0221 | 0.0029 | 86.88 | |
0.0154 | 0.0015 | 90.26 | |
PC 220(1:128)_Ceramic | |||
0.2548 | 0.0458 | 82.03 | |
0.5427 | 0.1034 | 80.95 | |
0.2379 | 0.0441 | 81.46 | |
PC 220(1:128)_Chrome | |||
0.2916 | 0.0441 | 84.88 | |
0.2952 | 0.0265 | 91.02 | |
0.4028 | 0.0352 | 91.26 | |
PC 220(1:128)_Fiberglass | |||
0.3183 | 0.0511 | 83.95 | |
0.2855 | 0.023 | 91.94 | |
0.3232 | 0.0514 | 84.1 | |
3M Non acid Bathroom cleaner -Ceramic | |||
0.3325 | 0.084 | 74.74 | |
0.6008 | 0.2322 | 61.35 | |
0.3427 | 0.0912 | 73.39 | |
3M Non acid Bathroom cleaner -Chrome | |||
0.3184 | 0.0768 | 75.88 | |
0.3851 | 0.0733 | 80.97 | |
0.1951 | 0.0429 | 78.01 | |
3M Non acid Bathroom cleaner -Fiberglass | |||
0.6121 | 0.1472 | 75.95 | |
0.3844 | 0.0833 | 78.33 | |
0.4439 | 0.0881 | 80.15 |
Success Rating:
A follow up test, usually based on company input.Conclusion:
The two products had an overall average efficiency over 85% and performed better than the conventional cleaning product.