Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors
Trial Purpose:
To evaluate products on ink removal from galvanized steel using manual wiping.
Date Run:
01/15/2009Experiment Procedure:
Seven products that were previously tested for client were based on performance. Each product was used at full strength and room temperature. Twenty-one preweighed galvanized steel coupons were coated with the supplied blue ink and allowed to dry. A second weighing was performed to determine the amount of ink added. Three coupons were placed into a Gardner Straight Line Washability unit. A 2-3 mL was applied to the coupons using a squeeze bulb. A Kimberly Clark Wypall X60 reinforced wiper was placed into the cleaning sled and also soaked with the cleaning solution. The machine was run for 30 seconds (~20 cycles), blotted dry with a fresh towel and weighed a final time to determine the effectiveness after 30 seconds. A second 30 second cleaning process was performed on the coupons to determine effectives after one minute of cleaning.
Trial Results:
Cleaning after 30 seconds had limited to moderate success for the seven products tested.
Cleaner | Initial wt | Final wt | % Removed |
DBE 6 | |||
0.0471 | 0.0293 | 37.79 | |
0.0457 | 0.0301 | 34.14 | |
0.0648 | 0.0350 | 45.99 | |
Soy Gold 1100 | |||
0.0461 | 0.0458 | 0.65 | |
0.0304 | 0.0300 | 1.32 | |
0.0585 | 0.0181 | 69.06 | |
Shopmaster RC | |||
0.0451 | 0.0199 | 55.88 | |
0.0392 | 0.0136 | 65.31 | |
0.0525 | 0.0095 | 81.9 | |
SC Soyester | |||
0.0569 | 0.0203 | 64.32 | |
0.0448 | 0.0167 | 62.72 | |
0.0378 | 0.0263 | 30.42 | |
Graffiti Remover SAC | |||
0.0624 | 0.0292 | 53.21 | |
0.0549 | 0.0190 | 65.39 | |
0.0461 | 0.0190 | 58.79 | |
Smart Solve 605 | |||
0.0528 | 0.0421 | 20.27 | |
0.0430 | 0.0246 | 42.79 | |
0.0532 | 0.0328 | 38.35 | |
Bean e Doo | |||
0.0506 | 0.0316 | 37.55 | |
0.0422 | 0.039 | 7.58 | |
0.0400 | 0.0321 | 19.75 |
The additional 30 seconds improved efficiencies by 5-30% for the various products. The overall efficiencies were calculated for the full one minute of cleaning. The final removal rates were based on the data in the next table.
Cleaner | Initial wt | Final wt | % Removed |
DBE 6 | |||
0.0471 | 0.0224 | 52.44 | |
0.0457 | 0.0250 | 45.30 | |
0.0648 | 0.0237 | 63.43 | |
Soy Gold 1100 | |||
0.0461 | 0.0448 | 2.82 | |
0.0304 | 0.0226 | 25.66 | |
0.0585 | 0.0164 | 71.97 | |
Shopmaster RC | |||
0.0451 | 0.0104 | 76.94 | |
0.0392 | 0.0065 | 83.42 | |
0.0525 | 0.0042 | 92.00 | |
SC Soyester | |||
0.0569 | 0.0138 | 75.75 | |
0.0448 | 0.0134 | 70.09 | |
0.0378 | 0.0259 | 31.48 | |
Graffiti Remover SAC | |||
0.0624 | 0.0054 | 91.35 | |
0.0549 | 0.0053 | 90.35 | |
0.0461 | 0.0021 | 95.44 | |
Smart Solve 605 | |||
0.0528 | 0.0259 | 50.95 | |
0.0430 | 0.0116 | 73.02 | |
0.0532 | 0.0219 | 58.83 | |
Bean e Doo | |||
0.0506 | 0.0184 | 63.64 | |
0.0422 | 0.0324 | 23.22 | |
0.0400 | 0.0243 | 39.25 |
Success Rating:
Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined.Conclusion:
The effective products will be evaluated on the supplied galvanized steel wire housing with ink markings.