Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors
Trial Purpose:
To evaluate supplied products for GS 37 bathroom cleaner performance.
Date Run:
01/14/2010Experiment Procedure:
The supplied cleaning products were used at the requested concentration and a third product (conventional) was used at full strength as recommended by the vendor for bathroom cleaning.
Preweighed ceramic, chrome and fiberglass coupons were coated with SSL Soil 1 (Bathroom soap scum: All-in-one shampoo and conditioner 28.6%, Dry skin lotion 21.4%, Liquid hand soap 21.4%, Liquid body wash 14.3%, Deodorant bar soap 7.2% and water 7.1%.) using a handheld swab and allowed to dry for 24 hours at room temperature. The contaminated coupons were weighed again to determine the amount of soil added.
Three coupons were placed into a Gardner Straight Line Washability unit. A Kimberly Clark Reinforced paper towel was attached to the cleaning sled and soaked with 5-7 sprays of cleaning solutions. Each coupon was sprayed 7-10 times with the same cleaning solution. The solution was allowed to penetrate for 30 seconds followed by cleaning in the SLW unit for 20 cycles (~33 seconds). At the end of the cleaning, coupons were wiped once with a dry paper towel. Final weights were recorded. Efficiencies were calculated and recorded.
Trial Results:
The two supplied products removed over 85% of the bathroom soap scum soil from all surfaces except one (One of the two products removed 80% from the chrome surface). The supplied conventional product removed less than 50% of the soil from the surfaces. The table lists the amount of soil added, the amount remaining and the efficiency for each coupon cleaned.
Cleaner | Initial wt | Final wt | % Removed |
DFC Restroom Ceramic | |||
0.2518 | 0.0254 | 89.91 | |
0.2647 | 0.0105 | 96.03 | |
0.2939 | 0.0224 | 92.38 | |
DFC Restroom Chrome | |||
0.2400 | 0.0545 | 77.29 | |
0.2567 | 0.0325 | 87.34 | |
0.2143 | 0.0465 | 78.30 | |
DFC Restroom Fiberglass | |||
0.1850 | 0.0202 | 89.08 | |
0.2799 | 0.0138 | 95.07 | |
0.1992 | 0.0162 | 91.87 | |
DFC Clacium Lime Rust Ceramic | |||
0.3295 | 0.0071 | 97.85 | |
0.3184 | 0.0163 | 94.88 | |
0.3656 | 0.0223 | 93.90 | |
DFC Calcium Lime Rust Chrome | |||
0.1534 | 0.0056 | 96.35 | |
0.1394 | 0.0027 | 98.06 | |
0.1067 | 0.0060 | 94.38 | |
DFC Calcium Lime Rust Fiberglass | |||
0.1857 | 0.0091 | 95.10 | |
0.2639 | 0.0121 | 95.41 | |
0.2325 | 0.0036 | 98.45 | |
Soft Scrub Ceramic | |||
0.1819 | 0.0558 | 69.32 | |
0.0961 | 0.0886 | 7.80 | |
0.3835 | 0.1673 | 56.38 | |
Soft Scrub Chrome | |||
0.0523 | 0.0233 | 55.45 | |
0.1020 | 0.0878 | 13.92 | |
0.1225 | 0.0761 | 37.88 | |
Soft Scrub Fiberglass | |||
0.1468 | 0.0798 | 45.64 | |
0.3632 | 0.1078 | 70.32 | |
0.1415 | 0.0261 | 81.55 |
Success Rating:
A follow up test, usually based on company input.Conclusion:
The DFC Restroom and Calcium, Lime & Rust cleaners removed over 85% of the SSL Bathroom soap scum using manual cleaning. Both outperformed the supplied conventional product on the same soil.