Related Images
Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors
Aircraft
Related Images
Project Number 1
Summary:
The clients current cleaner worked well for both contaminants in the first project.Test Objective:
Find a better degreasing solutionProduct Use:
Turbine engines| Trial Number | Date Run | Purpose | Success Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 07/27/1998 | To compare current oil vendor cleaner to other aqueous cleaner. | A follow up test, usually based on company input. |
| 1 | 08/06/1998 | To compare the current cleaner to other aqueous cleaner. | Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined. |
| 2 | 08/17/1998 | To compare the current cleaner to other aqueous cleaner. | Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined. |
| 3 | 09/17/1998 | Further comparison of current cleaner with two alternative products. | A follow up test, usually based on company input. |
| 4 | 10/01/1998 | Further comparison of the current cleaner to other aqueous cleaners. | A follow up test, usually based on company input. |
Project Number 2
Summary:
The second project found that hot water was effective in peeling the coating from the nickel alloy.Test Objective:
To discover different way of removing an adhesive coating.Product Use:
turbine engine blades| Trial Number | Date Run | Purpose | Success Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 08/11/1998 | To replace acetone in the coating removal process | Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined. |
| 1 | 08/26/1998 | To evaluate one cleaner and hot water for coating removal | A follow up test, usually based on company input. |
| 2 | 02/16/1999 | Request for Information | Technology Transfer. |