Default object view. Click to create a custom template, Node ID: 5572, Object ID: 5571

Trial #0

Trial #0

Determine effectiveness of three cleaners

1995

4

2

283

284

Part

04/05/1995

0.00

Immersion/Soak

There are no related objects.

Aluminum
Gold

Fluxes
Resins/Rosins

DI water rinse
Tap water rinse

Air Knives
Oven-Convection

Black light
Visual

The purpose of this trial is to determine the effectiveness of three different cleaners for the removal of flux for Electrical Manufacturer.
Cleaning was performed for fifteen minutes at 160o F in a beaker agitated with a stir-bar. Rinsing was performed in a tap water bath followed by a DI water bath. Both rinses were for 5 minutes at 140 F. The parts were then dried under an air knife for two minutes and in a convection oven for 60 minutes (at 210 F). After drying the parts were visually observed for any residual flux and/or water spotting.

SUBSTRATE MATERIAL: Gold-Coated Aluminum
CONTAMINANTS: Rosin Solder Flux
CONTAMINATING PROCESS USED: received contaminated from Electrical Manufacturer

The black light showed that all the flux was removed from the part cleaned with the Calgon Geo-Guard 2215.  There was a problem of water spotting on the parts.  Both WR Grace cleaners were ineffective in removing the flux from the parts.

The Geo-Guard 2215 seems to be a suitable chemistry for Electrical Manufacturer's needs.  The water spotting could be a big problem, so a new rinsing and drying method needs to be determined.

No relation

Name Class Section
Document Evaluation #0 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #1 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #2 Evaluation 3
Powered by eZ Publish™ CMS Open Source Web Content Management. Copyright © 1999-2014 eZ Systems AS (except where otherwise noted). All rights reserved.