Default object view. Click to create a custom template, Node ID: 37748, Object ID: 59358

Trial #4

Trial #4

To test the efficiency of BWG Amazing Glass Cleaner against Windex at removing Glass Soap Scum Soil from various substrates.

2025

34

1

0

0

Coupon

07/07/2025

0.50

Manual Wipe

Tatyanna Moreland Junior

Glass/Quartz
Mirror

SSL Soil 2 Glass Soap Scum

Vapor

Air dry

Gravimetric
Visual

Twelve pre-weighed coupons, six per substrate per cleaner, were contaminated with 0.5 g of Glass Soap Scum Soil composed of (INSERT INGREDIENTS). Coupons dried at room temperature (68°F) for 24 hours before their dirty weights were recorded. Three coupons of the same substrate were placed in a Single Line Washing Unit (SLW) with a Wypall X60 wipe attached to the cleaning sled. The wipe and coupons were sprayed two times with the cleaner and soaked for 10 seconds. The SLW was then run for 20 cleaning cycles (30 seconds of manual cleaning). Coupons dried overnight at room temperature before final weights were recorded.

Substrate Cleaner Coupon # Initial wt. Cont. wt. Clean wt. Initial wt of cont. Final wt of cont. %Cont Removed Average % Removal Average Cleaner %
Mirror BWG Amazing 21 37.0458 37.1381 37.0816 0.0923 0.0358 61.21 70.87 80.38
4 37.3081 37.4149 37.3367 0.1068 0.0286 73.22
10 37.4129 37.5274 37.4379 0.1145 0.025 78.17
Windex 9 37.6894 37.7851 37.6983 0.0957 0.0089 90.70 89.90
15 37.3152 37.4127 37.3266 0.0975 0.0114 88.31
6 37.9143 38.013 37.9235 0.0987 0.0092 90.68
Glass BWG Amazing 45 37.4369 37.5238 37.4472 0.0869 0.0103 88.15 87.58 90.12
35 37.7007 37.8205 37.7174 0.1198 0.0167 86.06
41 37.6404 37.746 37.6525 0.1056 0.0121 88.54
Windex 15 37.5616 37.6676 37.5759 0.106 0.0143 86.51 92.65
14 37.7987 37.9048 37.8034 0.1061 0.0047 95.57
7 37.6119 37.7161 37.6162 0.1042 0.0043 95.87
Rating Cleanliness
1 No Visible Filming/ Streaking (Excellent Performance)
2 Minimal Filming/ Streaking
3 Slight Filming/ Streaking
4 Noticeable Filming/ Streaking
5 Considerable Filming/ Streaking
6 Severe Filming/ Streaking
7 High Filming/ Streaking (Poor Performance)
      Cleanliness    
Cleaner Substrate Coupon 1 2 3 Average Product Avg
BWG Amazing Mirror 21 6 5.5 6 5.06 4.20
4 5 5 5
10 4 5 4
Glass 9 3.5 4.5 4 4.06
15 3.5 5 4
6 3 5 4
Windex Mirror 45 3 3 4 3.50 3.00
35 4 3.5 4.5
41 3.5 3 3
Glass 15 4 3.5 5 3.00
14 3.5 2 2
7 3 2 2
      Filming    
               
Cleaner   Coupon 1 2 3 Average Product Avg
BWG Amazing Mirror 21 6 6 6 6.00 5.59
4 6 6 6
10 6 6 6
Glass 9 6 6 6 6.22
15 6 7 6
6 6 7 6
Windex Mirror 45 5 4 5 4.56 4.61
35 4 5 5
41 4 4 5
Glass 15 3 6 6 4.61
14 3 5 5
7 3.5 6 4
      Streaking    
               
Cleaner Substrate Coupon 1 2 3 Average Product Avg
BWG Amazing Mirror 21 7 6.5 6 6.28 6.20
4 7 5 6
10 7 6 6
Glass 9 7 6 6 6.56
15 7 7 6
6 7 7 6
Windex Mirror 45 7 6 5 5.78 6.56
35 7 5 5
41 7 5 5
Glass 15 7 6 6 6.56
14 7 7 6
7 7 7 6

Windex was more effective than BWG Amazing Glass Cleaner on mirror and glass. Windex had better average product ratings for efficacy in both cleanliness and filming. BWG had a better average product rating for efficacy in streaking only. 

No relation

Name Class Section
Document Evaluation #0 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #1 Evaluation 3
Powered by eZ Publish™ CMS Open Source Web Content Management. Copyright © 1999-2014 eZ Systems AS (except where otherwise noted). All rights reserved.