Default object view. Click to create a custom template, Node ID: 37982, Object ID: 59642

Trial #0

Trial #0

To gather foundational information on the MS LLD regarding its potential use in high efficiency machines. To compare the foaming generation and stability of the MS LLD and baseline high efficiency laundry detergents.

2025

32

1

0

0

Coupon

10/28/2025

0.00

No relation

Amelia Wagner

There are no related objects.

There are no related objects.

There are no related objects.

There are no related objects.

Performance Test
Visual

  1. Prepare solutions: Create a 0.5% detergent solution by mixing detergent with distilled water.  The cleaners tested include MS LLD, Arm & Hammer High Efficiency Laundry Detergent, and Tide High Efficiency Laundry Detergent
  2. Fill test tubes: Pour 1 ml of the solution into a test tube.
  3. Add water: Add 5 ml of distilled water to each test tube.
  4. Shake: Seal the test tube and shake it 10 times to create foam.
  5. Measure foam height: Measure the amount of foam generated in ml. 
  6. Time:  Record the time it takes for the foam to fully dissipate (5 minutes interval)

MS LLD:  10 ml of foam was generated.  The foam did not dissipate within 5 minutes.

Arm & Hammer: 5.2 ml of foam was generated.  The foam did not dissipate within 5 minutes.

Tide: 5 ml of foam was generated.  Foam fully dissipated in 2 minutes 11 seconds

The MS LLD generated about double the amount of foam from 10 seconds of shaking than the Arm & Hammer and the Tide detergents.  The MS LLD foam stability matched that of the Arm & Hammer detergent, while the TIDE detergent exhibited less foam stability.

No relation

Name Class Section
Document Evaluation #0 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #1 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #2 Evaluation 3
Powered by eZ Publish™ CMS Open Source Web Content Management. Copyright © 1999-2014 eZ Systems AS (except where otherwise noted). All rights reserved.