Default object view. Click to create a custom template, Node ID: 27565, Object ID: 48653

Project #1

Project #1

Looking to partner with a consulting/testing facility that can provide efficacy testing on our products. I see that the primary mission of TURI is focused on identifying innovative, cost-effective ways to reduce toxic chemical usage. We would like to better understand what type of consulting services TURI may have that could assist E-Cloth develop and execute efficacy testing.

Yes

Yes

No

05/17/2018

There are no related objects.

Product is microfiber cloths used for various applications

Small

Less than 1 lb

Rough

Hard

Simple

No

Dirt
Films
Food
Greases
Oil
Soaps

No

Manual Wipe

Comparative testing

Time (min)

Tap

For us the goal is to make a claim on HSN that we clean and remove food. Based on your experience does one of these better meet that criteria or apply to some type of standard? Ultimately if both would qualify for a claim (again we were just asked to show before and after images and replicate three times) then I think we would prefer to go with the composition that would more likely deliver positive results (although both should)

Tap

No relation

Used Immediately

No relation

Mop - DCC 17 soil and dust-dirt option, Coated Wood, Title, Laminate
Window - run DCC 09 and 09A, Glass
Kitchen, Washing, Scrubbing, Stainless steel towels - food, ishware, Laminate, Stone for first 3 and stainless for the last

All of the above for bacteria removal claims.

No

Yes

No

No

No

Name Class Section
Document Trial #0 Trial 3
Document Trial #1 Trial 3
Document Trial #2 Trial 3
Document Trial #3 Trial 3
Document Trial #4 Trial 3
Document Trial #5 Trial 3
Document Trial #6 Trial 3
Powered by eZ Publish™ CMS Open Source Web Content Management. Copyright © 1999-2014 eZ Systems AS (except where otherwise noted). All rights reserved.