Default object view. Click to create a custom template, Node ID: 7656, Object ID: 7655

Trial #0

Trial #0

To evaluate the effectiveness of five TCE alternatives at removing lubricants from aluminum alloys.

2017

25

2

150

152

Coupon

07/11/2017

5.00

Immersion/Soak

Aluminum

None

None

Gravimetric

Preweighed aluminum coupons were tested for each cleaner. Coupons were soiled with Accu-Lube LB 6000 Lubricant (CAS 68583-51-7) using a swab to cover the bottom third of the substrate and dirty weights were recorded. Coupons were immersed, three at a time, in a beaker with 200ml of the chosen cleaner at room temperature (68 F) for five minutes. Visual observations were taken during this time, and final weights were recorded after cleaning.This process was repeated for each cleaner.

Cleaner Initial wt. Final wt. % Removed Average % Removed
Fluosolv CX        
  0.0666 0.0008 98.8 98.41
  0.0969 0.0022 97.73  
  0.1398 0.0018 98.71  
Fluosolv NC        
  0.1278 0.0013 98.98 95.44
  0.1311 0.0083 93.67  
  0.1311 0.0083 93.67  
Solstice PF        
  0.0958 0.0001 99.9 99.69
  0.108 0.0005 99.54  
  0.1088 0.0004 99.63  
Solstice PF-2A        
  0.0897 -0.0013 101.45 99.85
  0.0825 0.0007 99.15  
  0.0658 0.0007 98.94  
Vertrel Sion        
  0.1184 0.0043 96.37 96.39
  0.0825 0.0053 93.58  
  0.1154 0.0009 99.22  

Cleaners visually performed the same and removed a majority of the soil.

All five drop-in solvents were effective at removing lubricant from aluminum. Next step is to repeat this procedure on Blasocut 2000 Universal.

No relation

Name Class Section
Document Evaluation #0 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #1 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #2 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #3 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #4 Evaluation 3
Powered by eZ Publish™ CMS Open Source Web Content Management. Copyright © 1999-2014 eZ Systems AS (except where otherwise noted). All rights reserved.