Default object view. Click to create a custom template, Node ID: 7055, Object ID: 7054

Trial #12

Trial #12

To evaluate successful cleaners on initial wax

2004

11

7

61

61

Coupon

03/11/2004

30.00

Immersion/Soak

Jason Marshall

Ceramics

Waxes

Tap water rinse

Air Blowoff

Gravimetric

Three cleaners were selected from the past trials to be tested on the wax. Two products were used at full strength and one at 10% diluted with DI water in 250 ml beakers. All products were heated to 100 F on a hot plate.
Nine preweighed ceramic coupons were coated with client supplied wax, Zopher Mills Inc No 1563 Wax (mixture of waxes and resins). The wax was first melted using a Master Appliance heat gun in a beaker and applied directly to the coupon surface. The coupons were allowed to cool to room temperature before weighing a second time. Three coupons were cleaned in each solution for 30 minutes using stir-bar agitation. Coupons were rinsed in tap water for 15 seconds at 120 F, followed by air blow off at room temperature. Once dry, coupons were weighed a final time and efficiencies for each cleaner were calculated.

All products were then degassed for 5 minutes in a Branson 3510, 40 kHz ultrasonic tank at 100 F. Twelve preweighed ceramic coupons were coated with client supplied wax, Zopher Mills Inc No 1563 Wax (mixture of waxes and resins). The wax was first melted using a Master Appliance heat gun in a beaker and applied directly to the coupon surface. The coupons were allowed to cool to room temperature before weighing a second time. Three coupons were cleaned in each solution for 15 minutes using ultrasonic energy. Coupons were rinsed in tap water for 15 seconds at 120 F, followed by air blow off at room temperature. Once dry, coupons were weighed a final time and efficiencies for each cleaner were calculated.

Neither process worked for any of the products tested on the wax. No removal was over 20% of the wax.

Cleaner Initial wt Final wt % Removed
Micro 90 0.3808 0.3798 0.26
  0.2148 0.2123 1.16
  0.2611 0.2597 0.54
E3HB 0.2197 0.2184 0.59
  0.1634 0.1644 -0.61
  0.3027 0.3038 -0.36
Ink Zapper 0.2980 0.2937 1.44
  0.3852 0.3717 3.50
  0.3456 0.3386 2.03

Ultrasonic

Cleaner Initial wt Final wt % Removed
Micro 90 0.3798 0.3551 6.50
  0.2123 0.1761 17.05
  0.2597 0.2448 5.74
E3HB 0.2184 0.1702 22.07
  0.1644 0.1304 20.68
  0.3038 0.2699 11.16
Ink Zapper 0.2937 0.2545 13.35
  0.3717 0.3243 12.75
  0.3386 0.2744 18.96

The three products were found to be ineffective at removing this wax using immersion or ultrasonic agitation.

No relation

Name Class Section
Document Evaluation #0 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #1 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #2 Evaluation 3
Powered by eZ Publish™ CMS Open Source Web Content Management. Copyright © 1999-2014 eZ Systems AS (except where otherwise noted). All rights reserved.