Default object view. Click to create a custom template, Node ID: 5476, Object ID: 5475

Trial #0

Trial #0

Goal of trial is to find a cleaning method

1996

4

2

*

191

192

Part

05/07/1996

30.00

There are no related objects.

Steel
Teflon

Clay
Coatings

None

None

Visual

The goal of this trial is to find a viable method for Ceramic Coating Company to clean of their screens. Three different criteria wereused to determine the effectiveness of a cleaning method:

1) Cleanliness- The new method must remove most of the baked-on clay/silicon dioxides front the screens.
2) Economically Viable- The new method must be cost effective and should also require as little equipment as possible and must not damage the screens.
3) Environmentally Friendly- The new method must not add to or create hazardous waste and/or worker exposure.
From the above listed criteria, two different methods were selected to be tested. The first method was to use an environmentally friendly cleaning chemical to remove the baked-on clay/silicon dioxide. Nine different chemicals were chosen on the basis of strength and classification.
The sample screens obtained from Ceramic Coating Company were cleaned in a one-liter full-strength solution of each chemical. Cleaning was performed for 30 minutes at 120 F in a beaker agitated with a stir-bar. Cleaning effectiveness was observed by visual inspection.
The second method to be tested was a sodium bicarbonate blasting process used at AA Environmental in Woburn, MA. The sodium bicarbonate blasting is similar to sandblasting except it is virtually nondestructive and the blasting material is water soluble and non-hazardous so it can be washed away. AA Environmental is basically a contract cleaning company who will come down to one’s facility to perform the cleaning, but he sodium bicarbonate blasting equipment can also be purchased through them if so desired.

SUBSTRATE MATERIAL: Teflon coated steel screens
CONTAMINANTS: Baked on Kaolin Clay/Silicon Dioxide
CONTAMINATING PROCESS USED: As received from Ceramic Coating Company.

The first part of the test proved to be unsuccessful. The only chemical that even touched the clay/silicon dioxide was the W.R. Grace 294xx. From the long contact time needed for a full-strength solution, this part of testing was deemed nonviable and was not explored any further.
The sodium bicarbonate blasting proved to be very effective. All of the clay/silicon dioxide was removed from one half of a screen in less than a minute.

The one problem with the blasting was that the Teflon was also removed.

No relation

Name Class Section
Document Evaluation #0 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #1 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #3 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #4 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #5 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #6 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #7 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #8 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #9 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #10 Evaluation 3
Powered by eZ Publish™ CMS Open Source Web Content Management. Copyright © 1999-2014 eZ Systems AS (except where otherwise noted). All rights reserved.