Default object view. Click to create a custom template, Node ID: 6565, Object ID: 6564

Trial #2

Trial #2

To evaluate supplied parts for resistance to alkaline solution.

2007

15

5

25

26

Part

09/16/2007

960.00

Immersion/Soak

Jason Marshall

Glass/Quartz

There are no related objects.

There are no related objects.

There are no related objects.

Gravimetric

Glass samples were delivered polished to the specified polishing conditions. Each glass sample was weighed using a analytical balance. One sample of each glass type were hung by platinum wire into 0.01 mol/liter sodium hydroxide at 50 deg C for the length of times specified (15 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours or 16 hours). After this treatment, the samples were weighed again and the loss of the mass of the sample were calculated. Calculation of the time t0.1 in hours, necessary to etch a surface layer a depth of 0.1 um was done using the following formula:

t0.1 = (tedS)/[(m1-m2)*100]
where:
t0.1 = the time (min) necessary to etch a surface layer to a depth of 0.1 m
te = the time (min) for attach in the experiment
d = the specific gravity of the sample
S = the surface area (cm2) of the sample
m1 = the mass (mg) of the sample before the test
m2 = the mass (mg) of the sample after the test

Phosphate Resistance Class PR 1 2 3 4
Time t0.1 needed to etch to a depth of 0.1um/min >240 240~60 60~15 <15

In addition, changes in the surface of the sample following the treatment are qualitatively evaluated with the naked eye. Additional classification numbers are given according to the second table.

Additional Number Changes in the Surface
.0 No visible changes
.1 Clear, but irregular surface (wavy, pockmarked)
.2 Interference colors (slight selective leaching)
.3 Tenacious thin whitish layer (stronger selective)
.4 Loosely adhering thick layer (surface crust)

The target weight loss of 0.0010 grams (1 mg) was reached by two of the eight glass pieces (Sample A and Sample 1) after soaking for 16 hours. Samples 2 and B both were close to the 0.0010-gram level but did not exceed the value. The tables list the amount of weight loss after each time interval.

0.25 hour

sample id m1 m2 m1-m2
A 3.806 3.8058 0.0002
B 3.8679 3.8679 0.0000
C 3.8306 3.8305 0.0001
D 4.1472 4.1472 0.0000
1 6.4285 6.4286 -0.0001
2 1.2379 1.2379 0.0000
3 1.2177 1.2177 0.0000
4 1.2546 1.2543 0.0003
       
1 hour      
sample id m1 m2 m1-m2
A 3.806 3.8058 0.0002
B 3.8679 3.8675 0.0004
C 3.8306 3.8303 0.0003
D 4.1472 4.1467 0.0005
1 6.4285 6.4286 -0.0001
2 1.2379 1.2374 0.0005
3 1.2177 1.2177 0.0000
4 1.2546 1.2543 0.0003
       
4 hour      
sample id m1 m2 m1-m2
A 3.806 3.8054 0.0006
B 3.8679 3.8671 0.0008
C 3.8306 3.8303 0.0003
D 4.1472 4.1464 0.0008
1 6.4285 6.4278 0.0007
2 1.2379 1.2372 0.0007
3 1.2177 1.2177 0.0000
4 1.2546 1.2543 0.0003

.

Sample ID density(d)  surface area(s)  d*S time (te)  te*d*S te*d*S/[(m1-m2)*100]
A 3.22 45.66 147.032 16 2352.506 23525.0624
1 2.23 53.9 120.197 16 1923.152 16026.2667

.

Sample ID Level
A AR1.0
B AR1.0
C AR1.0
D AR1.0
1 AR1.0
2 AR1.0
3 AR1.0
4 AR1.0

Six samples did not exceed the 1 mg weight loss. However, all eight samples would be classified as AR1.0 as the two samples that did loose over the 1 mg did so only after 16 hours of soaking. None of the samples had any visible abnormalities.

No relation

Powered by eZ Publish™ CMS Open Source Web Content Management. Copyright © 1999-2014 eZ Systems AS (except where otherwise noted). All rights reserved.