Default object view. Click to create a custom template, Node ID: 35365, Object ID: 56691

Trial #2

Trial #2

To compare the effectiveness of two current cleaners to an identified alternative cleaner for removing asphalt and tar on road-maintenance tools and work truck beds.

2023

32

2

0

0

Coupon

11/14/2023

0.00

Immersion/Soak

Amelia Wagner

Stainless Steel

Asphalt

None

None

Gravimetric

Three pre-weighed stainless steel coupons were assigned to each cleaner. A tablespoon of EZ Street Premium Cold Asphalt was placed on each coupon before sandwiching the contaminated coupon between two steel plates. A mid-size compact car (curb weight: 3,186lbs-3,559lbs) rolled over the steel plates five times in a forward motion to compress the asphalt to the coupons which released the oil and grease to allow the gravel to adhere to the substrate. Dirty weights of the coupons were recorded before testing the cleaners using unheated immersion for 20 minutes with a stir bar set to 200rpm.  Once removed, each coupon was wiped with a paper towel to remove the dissolved soil and assess efficacy visually before taking final weights.

Cleaner Initial weight (g) of contaminate Final weight (g) of contaminate % Contamination Removed % Average
Big Orange-E 2.0443 0.0032 99.84 99.14
0.0967 0.0011 98.86
0.9272 0.0120 98.71
Solvs-It 3.8234 0.0131 99.66 98.56
0.5860 0.0210 96.42
4.9101 0.0195 99.60
Kinzua Thunderbolt 0.5988 0.0016 99.73 99.08
0.1808 0.0041 97.73
0.7436 0.0016 99.78
Pave Pro Green 0.3672 0.0095 97.41 90.29
0.0893 0.0160 82.08
0.1528 0.0132 91.36
Pave Pro Gold 0.1363 0.0248 81.80 85.59
0.1010 0.0187 81.49
0.2962 0.0193 93.48

Pave Pro products will be retested to see if outliers can be removed.

Kinzua Thunderbolt was as effective as the two current products currently being utilized by the client.

No relation

Powered by eZ Publish™ CMS Open Source Web Content Management. Copyright © 1999-2014 eZ Systems AS (except where otherwise noted). All rights reserved.