Default object view. Click to create a custom template, Node ID: 37609, Object ID: 59172

Trial #1

Trial #1

To understand how much foam is produced from the Virdivis FB1000 upon agitation and to test different methods for reducing foaming.

Additionally, to compare the foaming qualities of Virdivis and other safer alternative products to brewing caustics.

2025

32

2

0

0

Coupon

04/29/2025

0.00

No relation

Amelia Wagner

There are no related objects.

None

None

None

Timing
Visual

Thirty ml of the Virdivis FB1000 20% at room temperature was poured into a graduated cylinder (250 ml).  The top of the graduated cylinder was covered, while the graduated cylinder was vigorously shaken for five seconds.  After being shaken, the amount of foam generated was measured.  This same process was repeated again with 30 ml of Virdivis FB1000 20% at 160F, and 30 ml of Virdivis FB1000 20% + 2.5% of a defoaming agent (Ethox L-61 nonionic surfactant).

30ml Virdivis 20% @ room temperature: generated 80ml of foam

30ml Virdivis 20% @ 160F: generated 60ml of foam

30ml Virdivis 20% + 2.5% Ethox L-61 @ room temperature: generated 20ml of foam

30ml of EcoSafeway High pH cleaner 50% @ room temperature: generated 0ml of foam

30ml of EcoSafeway Descaler60 50% @ room temperature: generated 0ml of foam

While increasing the temperature does decrease the amount of foam generated, the reduction of foam generation was much more significant with the addition of the defoaming agent. The addition of the surfactant significantly (75% reduction) reduced the foam in the lab compared to heating the cleaner (25% reduction). 

The comparative safer alternative products produced no foam upon agitation.

No relation

Name Class Section
Document Evaluation #0 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #1 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #2 Evaluation 3
Powered by eZ Publish™ CMS Open Source Web Content Management. Copyright © 1999-2014 eZ Systems AS (except where otherwise noted). All rights reserved.