Default object view. Click to create a custom template, Node ID: 4428, Object ID: 4427

Project #1

Project #1

Comparison of two ultrasonic cleaners. Two parts to be supplied for analysis, one from each cleaner.

No

No

No

10/23/2002

Ted Coletti

Aluminum

6061 T-6

Housing for a precision pump used in clinical chemistry applications

1.5 x 1.5 x 2 inches

Small

Less than 1 lb

Smooth

Soft

Complex

Yes

Oil

No

Machining

Anodizing

500/day

16

40

Ultrasonics

Lewis vs Ransohoff lean jet with ultrasonics

BCS Ultra blue, Evercycle UCL

5 vs 3

130

6

Unknown

To remove coolant, chips and oils from machine

2

130

Tap

Oven-Convection

5

200

Stored

Parts are anodized

2 wks

OSEE

none

This analysis is to verify that a new ultrasonic cleaner under consideration cleans at least as well as our current cleaner.

Contact angle measurements of both parts resulted in nearly identical readings. The BCS cleaned part had an average angle of 67 and the Evercycle cleaned part had an average angle of 68. No difference in cleanliness can be found using this methodology.
OSEE measurements resulted in higher values for the BCS cleaned part than for the Evercycle part. The dirty part had a lower reading than both cleaned parts. From this comparison, the results would suggest that the BCS cleaned part was cleaner than the Evercycle part. The BCS part had an average OSEE reading of 733, the Evercycle part reading was 416 and the dirty part had a reading of 276.

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Name Class Section
Document Trial #0 Trial 3
Powered by eZ Publish™ CMS Open Source Web Content Management. Copyright © 1999-2014 eZ Systems AS (except where otherwise noted). All rights reserved.