Default object view. Click to create a custom template, Node ID: 7226, Object ID: 7225

Trial #0

Trial #0

To evaluate Methyl 408 and Ethyl 408 on their removal effectiveness of different soils on different substrates.

2015

22

2

0

0

Coupon

06/10/2015

5.00

Immersion/Soak

Stainless Steel

Greases
Oil

Tap water rinse

Air dry

Gravimetric

GS34 Soil 1 was the maintenance soil that was made up of 10 grams of carbon black, 10 grams iron oxide, 100 ml WD-40, 100 ml hydraulic oil, and 100 ml gear oil. Ethyl 408 performed better at removing this soil from stainless steel. The GS34 Soil 2 was the production soil which was made up of 200 ml Quench Oil and 200 ml cutting oil.

Both Methyl 408 and Ethyl 408 were excellent at removing this type of soil off of stainless steel. Both chemicals, in a span of 30 minutes, were able to take off at least half of the Apiezon Grease. If left immersed in these chemicals longer, the grease would most likely have been completely removed.

Degreasing      
Cleaning Category Degreasing    
Soil type Oil Grease  
Specific soil GS 34 Soil 1 GS 34 Soil 2 Apiezon Grease
Methyl 408 77.68% 99.31% 74.85%
Ethyl 408 83.04% 98.95% 68.04%

Overall, Ethyl 408 removes an average of 90.99% of oils, and Methyl 408 removes an average of 88.49%. Methyl 408, however, is better at removing grease.

No relation

Name Class Section
Document Evaluation #0 Evaluation 3
Document Evaluation #1 Evaluation 3
Powered by eZ Publish™ CMS Open Source Web Content Management. Copyright © 1999-2014 eZ Systems AS (except where otherwise noted). All rights reserved.