Browse Client Types

Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors

Trial Number 8

Trial Purpose:

To find the best fit product for cleaning Leach Garner’s #1 Masterdraw from copper and stainless steel surfaces meant to resemble the cleaning of precious metals.

Date Run:

09/08/2016

Experiment Procedure:

Coupons of stainless steel and copper were selected and arranged on trays, so that each cleaner had an assigned set of each surface. Before taking initial weights coupons were wiped down with Kimwipes. After taking weights the coupons were promptly soiled and reweighed. All cleaners were gathered in respective bottles and beakers. A stir bar was used in conjunction with a heating plate equipped to stir the solutions. The coupons were added to the beakers three of a kind at one time, and then allowed to sit in the stirred solution at room temperature for 5 minutes while observations were taken. Finally, clean weights were taken at the end of all the testing.

Trial Results:

Cleaner Substrate Initial wt. Final wt. % Cont Removed % Overall
Fluosolv CX Stainless 0.0727 0.0037 94.91  
Stainless 0.0395 0.0034 91.39 94.03
Stainless 0.0810 0.0034 95.80  
Copper 0.1005 0.0037 96.32  
Copper 0.0460 0.0031 93.26 95.13
Copper 0.0861 0.0036 95.82  
FluoSolv NC Stainless 0.0884 0.0034 96.15  
Stainless 0.0436 0.0025 94.27 95.45
Stainless 0.0689 0.0028 95.94  
Copper 0.0865 0.0018 97.92  
Copper 0.0588 0.0026 95.58 95.68
Copper 0.0790 0.0051 93.54  
Vertrel Sion Stainless 0.0681 0.0019 97.21  
Stainless 0.0451 0.0036 92.02 95.48
Stainless 0.0644 0.0018 97.20  
Copper 0.0965 0.0016 98.34  
Copper 0.0880 0.0017 98.07 98.19
Copper 0.0760 0.0014 98.16  
Solstice PF Stainless 0.0572 0.0037 93.53  
Stainless 0.1256 0.0039 96.89 95.49
Stainless 0.0759 0.0030 96.05  
Copper 0.0860 0.0060 93.02  
Copper 0.0730 0.0055 92.47 93.38
Copper 0.1123 0.0060 94.66  

Success Rating:

Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined.

Conclusion:

The percent removal for all the cleaners were quite high, yet there was streaking and some filming left behind for every coupon. Overall, Honeywell’s Solstice PF did not perform as well as some of the others, as it left behind significantly more content than any other cleaner. There was no cleaner that was effective in cleaning without leaving a film or streaks, but of those used Vertrel Sion was the best candidate. The coupons seemed to resist streaking better if they were pulled from the solution slowly, rather than just pulling them out.

Save Report as a PDF