Browse Client Types

Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors

Trial Number 0

Trial Purpose:

To compare the efficiency of removing DCC-17 on multiple substrates using a supplied cleaning product sample and competitor sample.

Date Run:

02/17/2016

Experiment Procedure:

Nine coupons for each sample (three ceramic, three plastic, and three painted steel) were weighed for initial weights. Using a swab, coupons were then dirtied with 0.5 grams of DCC17 and air dried at 68˚F overnight. Dirty weights were then collected the next day. The cleaning samples were diluted to requested amounts, Ecolab Wall Glide 2/128 and Peroxi-det 10/128, and placed into the same brand lab testing spray bottles.

Three coupons were placed into a Gardner Straight Line Washability unit. A Wypall X60 reinforced wipe was attached to the cleaning sled and treated with two sprays of cleaning solution. Each coupon was treated with the same cleaning solution two times. The solution was allowed to penetrate for 30 seconds followed by cleaning in the SLW unit for 20 cycles (30 seconds of cleaning).

Coupons were placed back on the tray and then weighed for a final weight. If coupon's gravimetric final results were off, coupons were reweighed the next day to allow for air drying.

Trial Results:

Ecolab Wall Glide’s performance on coupons was very similar per substrate. Peroxi-det, however, had a harder time removing DCC-17 from the Ceramic and plastic coupons. On painted steel, Peroxi-det was effective at removing the soil.

Cleaner  Substrate  Initial wt Final wt. % Removed Average  Overall Ave
Ecolab Wall Glide Diluted 2/128            
  Ceramic 0.3384 0.0508 84.99 86.30 88.17
    0.5207 0.0864 83.41    
    0.6502 0.0617 90.51    
  Plastic 0.5375 0.0984 81.69 86.67  
    0.5070 0.0527 89.61    
    0.5254 0.0593 88.71    
  Painted 0.5307 0.0866 83.68 91.54  
    0.4811 0.0190 96.05    
    0.6266 0.0320 94.89    
Peroxi-det Diluted 10/128            
  Ceramic 0.4472 0.1500 66.46 66.86 73.53
    0.5355 0.2162 59.63    
    0.5099 0.1300 74.50    
  Plastic 0.4586 0.1482 67.68 69.18  
    0.5248 0.1362 74.05    
    0.4974 0.1700 65.82    
  Painted 0.4967 0.1317 73.49 84.54  
    0.4628 0.0445 90.38    
    0.4884 0.0500 89.76    

Success Rating:

Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined.

Conclusion:

Ecolab Wall Glide performed more effective overall (88.17%) on all substrates compared to Peroxi-det (73.52%).

Save Report as a PDF