Browse Client Types

Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors

Trial Number 1

Trial Purpose:

To test the efficacy of Green Mountain Amenities Citric Acid and Washing Soda All Purpose cleaner and Etee All Purpose cleaner against other all purpose cleaners on the market.

Date Run:

09/15/2023

Experiment Procedure:

Eighteen pre-weighed coupons per cleaner, three of each substrate, were contaminated with Hucker's Soil Formulation (Jiff Creamy Peanut Butter 9.2%, Salted Butter 9.2%, Arrowhead Mills stone-ground wheat flour 9.2%, Egg Yolk 9.2%, Evaporated milk 13.8%, Distilled water 45.8%, Printer's ink with boiled linseed oil 0.9%, Shaws saline Solution 2.7%) using a handheld swab and dried for two hours at room temperature (68 F). The contaminated coupons were weighed before placing three coupons per cleaner of the same substrate into a Gardner Straight Line Washability (SLW) unit. A Kimberly-Clark Wypal reinforced paper towel was attached to the cleaning sled. The Wypal and each coupon were treated with three sprays and cleaned for 20 cycles (~30 seconds of cleaning). Clean coupons dried for 24 hours before final weights were taken.

Trial Results:

Cleaner Coupon Initial wt of cont. Final wt of cont. %Cont Removed % AVG % Overall
Simple Green Ceramic 0.4882 0.1848 62.15 77.77 85.92
0.4901 0.0031 99.37
0.4827 0.1362 71.78
Painted Metal 0.4477 0.0152 96.6 97.56
0.5085 0.0142 97.21
0.43 0.0049 98.86
Plastic 0.5321 0.1379 74.08 82.44
0.5718 0.1004 82.44
0.5701 0.0524 90.81
Nine Elements Multipurpose Ceramic 0.4944 0.0013 99.74 99.83 94.52
0.5255 0.0007 99.87
0.5014 0.0006 99.88
Painted Metal 0.4546 0.0356 92.17 84.5
0.4456 0.0214 95.2
0.5046 0.1709 66.13
Plastic 0.4885 0.0045 99.08 99.23
0.5086 0.0028 99.45
0.5703 0.0047 99.18
Oasis All Purpose Ceramic 0.5004 0.1271 74.6 85.7 93.33
0.5453 0.0108 98.02
0.5517 0.0856 84.48
Painted Metal 0.5623 0.015 97.33 97.54
0.4692 0.0125 97.34
0.5292 0.0109 97.94
Plastic 0.5122 0.003 99.41 96.76
0.4909 -0.0045 100.92
0.5281 0.0531 89.95
Grove All Purpose Ceramic 0.4355 0.0209 95.2 99.58 95.36
0.4947 -0.0091 101.84
0.5517 -0.0094 101.7
Painted Metal 0.5318 0.0249 95.32 92.96
0.4791 0.0449 90.63
0.4985 0.0352 92.94
Plastic 0.5541 0.0287 94.82 93.55
0.5182 0.0407 92.15
0.5479 0.0346 93.68
GMA Citric Acid + Washing Soda Ceramic 0.5092 0.0146 97.13 94.92 93.23
0.5153 0.0049 99.05
0.5266 0.0602 88.57
Painted Metal 0.5267 0.0381 92.77 94.43
0.5085 0.0263 94.83
0.5445 0.0234 95.7
Plastic 0.5618 0.0981 82.54 90.33
0.5298 0.025 95.28
0.488 0.0333 93.18
GMA Etee All Purpose  Ceramic 0.4605 0.018 96.09 92.7 80.91
0.4661 0.0518 88.89
1.4598 0.1004 93.12
Painted Metal 0.4747 0.0798 83.19 60.15
0.4888 0.1505 69.21
0.4835 0.3479 28.05
Plastic 0.5009 0.0309 93.83 89.87
0.4944 0.0397 91.97
0.5098 0.0826 83.8
GMA 15% D-Limonene Ceramic 0.5228 0.0095 98.18 98.35 81.54
0.4994 0.0016 99.68
0.5039 0.0142 97.18
Painted Metal 0.4698 0.0955 79.67 60.14
0.5705 0.2553 55.25
0.5568 0.3035 45.49
Plastic 0.488 0.0187 96.17 86.12
0.4806 0.0958 80.07
0.5294 0.0947 82.11

Success Rating:

Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined.

Conclusion:

All GMA cleaners are effective cleaners. The Citric Acid and Washing Soda Cleaner performed equal to/better than two of the comparative products.  The Etee All purpose and 15% D Limonene did not clean equal to/ better than any of the comparative products.

Save Report as a PDF