Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors
Trial Purpose:
To evaluate the effectiveness of Four Green Mountain Ammenities floor care products in comparison to two floor care products already on the market.
Date Run:
10/12/2023Experiment Procedure:
Eighteen coupons per cleaner, three of each substrate, were used. The initial weights of each coupon were taken. The initial L value (measure of fluorescence) was also taken with the colorimeter. The coupons were contaminated with synthetic dirt using a handheld swab and dried overnight. The contaminated coupons were weighed and the dirty L value was measured before placing three coupons per cleaner of the same substrate into a Gardner Straight Line Washability (SLW) unit. A Kimberly-Clark Wypal reinforced paper towel was attached to the cleaning sled. The Wypal and each coupon were treated with three sprays and cleaned for 20 cycles (~30 seconds of cleaning). Clean coupons dried for 24 hours before final weights were taken to assess the amount of soil removed. The final L value was taken in order to assess the amount of staining left behind by the soil.
Trial Results:
Cleaner | Soil | Initial wt of cont. | Final wt of cont. | %Cont Removed | % AVG | % Overall |
GMA Citric Acid and Washing Soda | Vinyl | 0.0232 | 0.0000 | 100.00 | 99.28 | 96.04 |
0.0092 | 0.0002 | 97.83 | ||||
0.0066 | 0.0000 | 100.00 | ||||
Ceramic | 0.0149 | 0.0012 | 91.95 | 91.80 | ||
0.0133 | 0.0003 | 97.74 | ||||
0.0049 | 0.0007 | 85.71 | ||||
Laminate | 0.0091 | 0.0000 | 100.00 | 97.04 | ||
0.0084 | 0.0005 | 94.05 | ||||
0.0102 | 0.0003 | 97.06 | ||||
Murphy Oil Soap 50% | Vinyl | 0.0055 | 0.0004 | 92.73 | 88.73 | 89.34 |
0.0059 | 0.0009 | 84.75 | ||||
0.0062 | 0.0007 | 88.71 | ||||
Ceramic | 0.0081 | 0.0003 | 96.30 | 96.43 | ||
0.0212 | 0.0007 | 96.70 | ||||
0.0108 | 0.0004 | 96.30 | ||||
Laminate | 0.0101 | 0.0014 | 86.14 | 82.86 | ||
0.0257 | 0.0031 | 87.94 | ||||
0.0051 | 0.0013 | 74.51 | ||||
Fabuloso 50% | Vinyl | 0.0097 | 0.0005 | 94.85 | 96.86 | 97.09 |
0.0183 | 0.0004 | 97.81 | ||||
0.0240 | 0.0005 | 97.92 | ||||
Ceramic | 0.0152 | 0.0001 | 99.34 | 96.29 | ||
0.0164 | 0.0004 | 97.56 | ||||
0.0187 | 0.0015 | 91.98 | ||||
Laminate | 0.0055 | 0.0000 | 100.00 | 98.12 | ||
0.0107 | 0.0003 | 97.20 | ||||
0.0177 | 0.0005 | 97.18 | ||||
GMA Etee Floor 50% | Vinyl | 0.1166 | 0.0011 | 99.06 | 87.48 | 79.64 |
0.0908 | 0.0258 | 71.59 | ||||
0.1122 | 0.0092 | 91.80 | ||||
Ceramic | 0.0548 | 0.0256 | 53.28 | 75.29 | ||
1.0213 | 0.0207 | 97.97 | ||||
0.0461 | 0.0117 | 74.62 | ||||
Laminate | 0.0425 | 0.0084 | 80.24 | 76.15 | ||
0.0179 | 0.0012 | 93.30 | ||||
0.0366 | 0.0165 | 54.92 | ||||
GMA NaDCC 1000 ppm | Vinyl | 0.1009 | 0.0026 | 97.42 | 92.10 | 82.07 |
0.0688 | 0.0067 | 90.26 | ||||
0.0712 | 0.0081 | 88.62 | ||||
Ceramic | 0.0575 | 0.0193 | 66.43 | 74.74 | ||
0.0536 | 0.0020 | 96.27 | ||||
0.0291 | 0.0112 | 61.51 | ||||
Laminate | 0.0388 | 0.0197 | 49.23 | 79.38 | ||
0.1047 | 0.0070 | 93.31 | ||||
0.1042 | 0.0046 | 95.59 | ||||
GMA Peracetic Acid 500ppm | Vinyl | 0.0730 | 0.0002 | 99.73 | 99.31 | 90.08 |
0.2599 | 0.0025 | 99.04 | ||||
0.1315 | 0.0011 | 99.16 | ||||
Ceramic | 0.0916 | 0.0055 | 94.00 | 79.02 | ||
0.0403 | 0.0164 | 59.31 | ||||
0.0757 | 0.0123 | 83.75 | ||||
Laminate | 0.1303 | 0.0063 | 95.17 | 91.92 | ||
0.1158 | 0.0220 | 81.00 | ||||
0.2504 | 0.0010 | 99.60 |
Gravimetric
Cleaner | Soil | Initial L | Dirty L | Clean L | % AVG | % Overall |
GMA Citric Acid and Washing Soda | Vinyl | 80.23 | 56.77 | 63.24 | 52.19% | 70.54% |
79.34 | 58.71 | 68.78 | ||||
77.73 | 59.41 | 74.1 | ||||
Ceramic | 90.21 | 73.75 | 89.73 | 95.22% | ||
90.77 | 69.23 | 89.91 | ||||
90.68 | 74.68 | 89.49 | ||||
Laminate | 62.47 | 43.8 | 57.96 | 64.21% | ||
64.35 | 47.91 | 58.04 | ||||
61.47 | 43.33 | 53.34 | ||||
Murphy Oil Soap 50% | Vinyl | 79.07 | 53.42 | 61.57 | 31.00% | 44.73% |
79.52 | 60.47 | 62.74 | ||||
79.67 | 51.62 | 65.45 | ||||
Ceramic | 90.57 | 75.86 | 86.88 | 90.35% | ||
90.41 | 64.11 | 90.04 | ||||
89.91 | 68.66 | 89.39 | ||||
Laminate | 55.51 | 45.99 | 48.25 | 12.82% | ||
59.92 | 40.21 | 48.56 | ||||
59.83 | 51 | 48.56 | ||||
Fabuloso 50% | Vinyl | 81.89 | 52.88 | 62.99 | 23.40% | 40.87% |
80.08 | 55.53 | 59.61 | ||||
79.69 | 52.71 | 57.76 | ||||
Ceramic | 90.38 | 65.68 | 89.65 | 90.69% | ||
90.14 | 61.28 | 89.73 | ||||
90.17 | 70.55 | 85.55 | ||||
Laminate | 62 | 48.13 | 48.95 | 8.51% | ||
63.52 | 46.33 | 47.23 | ||||
64.63 | 48.71 | 51 | ||||
GMA Etee Floor 50% | Vinyl | 68.16 | 51.79 | 46.55 | -15.23% | 38.97% |
66.32 | 49.91 | 44.73 | ||||
72.46 | 43.66 | 48.81 | ||||
Ceramic | 90.15 | 46.88 | 88.22 | 93.78% | ||
90.59 | 68.67 | 88.66 | ||||
90.55 | 62.34 | 89.03 | ||||
Laminate | 58.5 | 40.22 | 46.14 | 38.35% | ||
58.42 | 43 | 48.34 | ||||
55.13 | 45.49 | 50.12 | ||||
GMA NaDCC 1000 ppm | Vinyl | 76.48 | 45.11 | 59.1 | 9.81% | 56.93% |
74.64 | 47.39 | 52.56 | ||||
73.26 | 54.42 | 47.99 | ||||
Ceramic | 90.45 | 53.45 | 87.44 | 87.69% | ||
90.32 | 60.47 | 86.18 | ||||
89.86 | 66.49 | 86.37 | ||||
Laminate | 52.91 | 40.22 | 46.14 | 73.29% | ||
48.38 | 43 | 48.34 | ||||
51.75 | 45.49 | 50.12 | ||||
GMA Peracetic Acid 500ppm | Vinyl | 71.04 | 46.36 | 51.56 | 11.07% | 32.76% |
69.92 | 46.85 | 55.61 | ||||
69.65 | 55.6 | 51.97 | ||||
Ceramic | 90.13 | 42.94 | 89.3 | 86.75% | ||
87.35 | 58.22 | 85.39 | ||||
90.27 | 58.42 | 80.31 | ||||
Laminate | 55.73 | 38.68 | 43.78 | 0.47% | ||
53.29 | 45 | 40.12 | ||||
54.87 | 39.1 | 43.89 |
Success Rating:
Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined.Conclusion:
All GMA products were effective in removing soil from the coupons. The GMA Citric Acid and Washing Soda performed the best out of all the GMA products and performed better than one of the comparative products, Murphy Oil Soap. The GMA Etee Floor Cleaner although an effective cleaner in removing soil, performed the worst of all products tested.
Looking at the effectiveness of removing staining, only the GMA Citric Acid and Washing Soda was effective. All other products tested were not effective. It should be noted however, that all products tested were able to remove a significant amount of staining from the ceramic coupons specifically.