Browse Client Types

Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors

Trial Number 1

Trial Purpose:

To evaluate supplied product (Quicksolv DMC) for varnish removal from copper coupons.

Date Run:

05/30/2017

Experiment Procedure:

A set of pre-weighed copper coupons were soiled with 0.5 grams of Shellac amber varnish using a hand held swab. Another set of pre-weighed copper coupons were soiled with 0.5 grams of red lacquer using a hand held swab. After soiling the coupons with the respective soil, each coupon was re-weighed to determine the amount of contaminant added.

Cleaning Process:

Three copper coupons soiled with the same soil were placed into a Gardner Straight Line Washability unit.  A Wypall X60 reinforced wipe was attached to the cleaning sled and soaked with 1 spray of cleaning solution. Each coupon was sprayed once with the same cleaning solution. Each cleaning solution was used at full concentration. The solution was allowed to penetrate/contact for 30 seconds followed by cleaning in the SLW unit for 20 cycles (~33 seconds). 

Efficacy Rating Process:

After cleaning, the coupons were left to sit at room temperature for 1 hour before re-weighing the coupons for the amount of contaminants removed. The efficacy of a cleaner is measured by the amount of contaminated removed using gravimetric analysis. An effective cleaner is one that is observed to have an efficacy rating of 85% or higher.

Chemistries Evaluated:       Quicksolv DMC; Acetone

Trial Results:

None of the cleaners were effective in removing either of the varnishes (red and amber) from the copper coupons using manual cleaning.  The sample cleaner (Quicksolv DMC) was observed to be less effective than the comparative cleaner (acetone) with removing shellac amber varnish from copper coupons; with respective efficacy ratings of 44.06% and 62.67%. Similarly, the sample cleaner (Quicksolv DMC) was observed to be less effective than the comparative cleaner (acetone) with removing red lacquer from copper coupons; with respective efficacy ratings of 15.55% as compared to 41.86%.  Table pertaining to the amount of contaminant added and removed using a gravimetric scale, to measure the efficacy of the respective cleaners.

Cleaner Soil Type Initial wt. of Cont. (g) Final wt. of Cont. (g) Cont. Removed (%) Avg. Cont. Removed  (%) Overall Avg. Cont. Removed (%)
Quicksolv DMC _Trial 1 Shellac Amber Varnish 0.2278 0.0934 59 41.91 44.06
0.2065 0.0957 53.66
0.2343 0.2037 13.06
Quicksolv DMC _Trial 2* 0.2454 0.161 34.39 46.22
0.2443 0.1631 33.24
0.3816 0.1106 71.02
Quicksolv DMC _Trial 1 Red Lacquer 0.1974 0.184 6.79 7.96 15.55
0.2124 0.1942 8.57
0.2056 0.1881 8.51
Quicksolv DMC _Trial 2* 0.2048 0.1857 9.33 23.14
0.1917 0.1694 11.63
0.3331 0.1717 48.45
Acetone_Trial 1 Shellac Amber Varnish 0.2184 0.1178 46.06 57.19 62.67
0.2365 0.0901 61.9
0.2272 0.0827 63.6
Acetone_Trial 2* 0.2387 0.0784 67.16 68.16
0.2444 0.0627 74.35
0.2506 0.0928 62.97
Acetone_Trial 1 Red Lacquer 0.2497 0.1793 28.19 40.1 41.86
0.1386 0.0324 76.62
0.4146 0.3504 15.48
Acetone_Trial 2* 0.1859 0.0183 90.16 43.62
0.256 0.2163 15.51
0.1997 0.1494 25.19

*Note that there are two cleaning trials because the first trials were observed to have a high standard deviation. Therefore; a second trial was conducted to verify the results of the first trial.

Success Rating:

Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the sampled cleaner (Quicksolv DMC) was not as effective as the comparative cleaner (acetone) in removing varnish contaminants on copper coupons from both the first and second manual cleaning test trials.

Save Report as a PDF